Provided is an excellent, straight forward lesson on what demons are: this includes the historical meaning of the word, and also why Yahshua Jesus approached those who were demon possessed as he did. This is just one more lesson amongst many that provide clear facts about the truth behind demons in the bible.
Note: What this man says about the name of Yahweh is inaccurate.
Blessings
There has been much debate, division and argument over the spelling and pronunciation of the Holy Name of the Father. Many understand that the 4 letters of YHWH are what the first Israelites knew as the Fathers name; but modernly, many have become unsure of how these letters are pronounced. There are Yahweh loving congregations that keep themselves separated from their brethren by pronouncing Yahweh as YahOweh, or YahUweh, and diverse variations, and due to these slight differences a brand of confusion and division has resulted.
This video will show with great detail how to correctly pronounced the Name of Yahweh, and why it is pronounced the way it is. Through such disclosure, all believers will be granted a fuller understanding of who their Master is, and finally understand why the Holy name has existed in obscurity and confusion for so long. Blessings in the Most Holy and Blessed Yahshua Messiah, Jesus our Saviour.
Share this Video and educate others.
“Prove all things, hold fast that which is good.” (I Thes 5:21)
It is demonstrably acknowledged that Jesus, Yahshua the Messiah, was the wisdom of Yahweh (1Cor 1:24). It is also settled that He had an understanding of the Holy Scriptures that could not be compared with any other individual before or after Him. For modern theologians to presume that the Messiah could err in scriptural doctrine is a faulty assertion, one that has been promulgated, codified and believed in by almost all. Claiming that Yahshua Jesus had an eschewed knowledge on the actual nature of what many modern believers agree to be disembodied living human spirits, or disordered angels, is a great oversight in the theologian’s tradition-motivated diligence to substantiate radical demonology and literal demoniac possession. Because of misunderstandings regarding the Messiah’s culture and the Holy Scriptures, many have run head first into superstitious conclusions about doctrines concerned with demons, and this is due to the New Testaments simple and clear matter of fact-ness regarding demonism. A great problem that exists is that the superficial treatment of demons in the New Testament is, when read outside of and apart from its natural context, incorrectly understood in almost every one of its treatments on the matter. Meaning that in order for any to correctly understand what’s truthfully stated, a certain amount of work is required, and this work is the reader’s responsibility. In order for the Messiah to have believed in the existence of literal beings whom possessed the bodies of living people, He would have to have been receptive to pagan ruminations and their vain philosophies. Furthermore, for the Messiah to believe in literal demons He would have to have been acting in a way latently antagonistic towards the various and plainly stated truths discussed in the only scriptures He had as foundationally sure, those being they found in the Tanakh. If it were true that He did ignore the words in the Tanakh, this would have brought multifarious problems into His ministry, problems that scripturally could not exist if He was to remain the promised Messiah. With acknowledgement of this, it is our responsibility to re-align the actions and teachings of the One Holy Messiah with the truths found in His Tanakh, and then understand the sure road of explanation for why Yahshua would seem to both teach and substantiate the existence of disembodied spirits who afflict, disease and possess the living in a Gentle influenced Israel, while the Scriptures He lived upon clearly stated exactly the opposite.
The Messiah was a law giver. It could be argued that He was also the very Word that spoke to the Prophets. In the flesh He was demonstrated to be the wisdom of Yahweh Himself. To suggest that the Messiah had erred in one of the most fundamental and clearly defined Old Testament doctrines (regarding posthumous spiritual existence before the judgment), would be first on behalf of the educated a gross oversight, and secondly, a reading into, or more properly stated eisegesis of the scriptures. By inspiration, the Messiah told Paul that men were appointed once to die than after this the judgment (Heb 9:27), and the Spirit of Holiness also told Solomon that when men died they could no longer think or act (Ecc 9:10), yet the superstitious Hellenized Pharisee would have all people believe that after death those who passed away in an angry state of mind could spiritually leave their graves and seek new lodgings in the abodes of the sinful or somehow susceptible persons. Teachings on the spirits of the dead have not come from 1st Samuel verse 28, nor had it come from the Messiahs parable about Lazerous and the rich man, which I mention arose much later than the belief of the spiritual life of evil spirits, but was one attained from historical heathendom, either Greek, Roman, Babylonian, Indian or Persian; this idea came fully prepared with a complete demonology as well. Such beliefs were so well feared by the people of the first century, that the apostles on no less than two occasions believed Jesus to be a wayward spirit, and this was after they had been educated by Him during His ministry. The notion of demonic possession was a superstition that was very firmly rooted in the cultural consciousness of their time – as it remains so concreted everywhere today.
For brevities sake here are the Old Testament scriptures that confirm the impossibility of posthumous thoughts and existence before the judgement.
Ecc 8:8 There is no man that hath power over the spirit to retain the spirit; neither hath he power in the day of death
Ecc 9:6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.
Ecc 9:10 Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.
Psa 6:5 For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?
Psa 146:3-4 Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help. His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.
One of the first Old Testament examples of an individual expressing the belief in spiritual possession comes from the King of Babylon. This is fitting, seeing that spirit possession is an belief taken from Babylonian mysteries.
Dan 4:9 “O Belteshazzar, master of the magicians, because I know that the spirit of the holy gods is in thee, and no secret troubleth thee, tell me the visions of my dream that I have seen, and the interpretation thereof. (KJV)
The Aramaic source says the “Spirit of the Holy God” singular. This still promotes belief in the notion of spiritual possession.This scripture has many different translations, but all hold to the idea that a spirit inhabits the body of Daniel.
Many people believe that Jesus never corrected the unashamed errors contained in the beliefs of demonic possession existing all over the 1st century world, but such conjecture is incomplete and because of its incompleteness absolutely erroneous. In actuality, Yahshua Jesus openly condemned the heathenized Pharisee belief that demons could ever enter the body and control one’s mind or will. The rebuke of this notion took place while He taught in Galilee which was a section of Israel that had been utterly steeped in demonic superstitions.
The foundation of any sort and every kind of Satanism is: ignorance, superstition, disobedience, self-infatuation, diverse sorts of hatred and idolatry. The only power in any occult sign or symbol is its ability to make you to sin. All occult symbols from the beginning of humanity until today, have been nothing more then the imaginary empowering’s of lifeless squiggles created by the human imagination, depicting some sort of sinful or idolatrous thing, in one form or the next. Satanists and Luciferian’s are nothing more then the most ignorant of lascivious reprobates (who have a chance to live and be loved if they seek forgiveness and repentance by following Yahshua the Messiah). I title them as such because even normal lascivious unrepentant reprobates don’t sacrifice their lives or sometimes the lives of others to imaginary beings. Therefore, Do not fear devil worshippers, or their imaginary play things. Magic is ignorance.
What this number really means
Because people try to interpret the scriptures without first having a sound foundational understanding of the Bible, they are lead to believe in all kinds of lies that don’t make any Biblical sense. For instance, a whole mythology has been created around the number 666, this mythology has come from ignorant rock musicians, or even maybe theologians who haven’t correctly understand the book of revelations and its reference to said number.
Fact: 666 is not the number of a demonic force, nor is it the number of satan. This number alone has no magical powers, nor is it Biblically the representation of all things evil.
Fact: The number 666 is an allusion to Daniel chapter 3, and what Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had made his people do. This King commanded his people to worship his golden statue at pain of death. This act of worship was 666.
“Here is wisdom: Let him who has understanding compute the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man and its number is six hundred and sixty six.” (HRV REV 16:18)
Okay, so if six hundred and sixty-six is the number of the beast, than who or what is the beast? According to the book of revelations, the beast is a monster that john saw “coming up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and on his horns ten crowns, and on its heads names of blasphemy.” (This beast is a Kingdom, and this kingdom is referred to as Babylon the great). John continues, “And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and its feet were like the feet of a bear, and its mouth was as a lion’s mouth. And the dragon gave its power to it, and its throne, and great authority.”
The dragon here discussed is not satan but Rome, and Rome is synonymous with the final beast seen in the dream of Daniel the prophet, the dragon is explained as: “terrifying and frightening and very powerful. It had large iron teeth; it crushed and devoured its victims and trampled underfoot whatever was left. It was different from all the former beasts, and it had ten horns.” – Or In other words was a dragon. This forth beast is well known to be the Roman empire and this is not attested by modern or late theologians.
The beast of revelations 13 is a world wide Governmental power, and Vatican Rome (who is the Dragon of Daniel chapter 4) will be part and parcel with this system. There is no mention of satan or a devil in this chapter of the book of Revelations, nor is the devil ever explicitly mentioned in Daniel (unless people assume it was him who fought of the angel sent to give a message, this cannot be at all properly determined beyond speculation). So, what is 666? Six hundred and sixty six is the number of a man, and that man is the King of Babylon (no other than Nebuchadnezzar of the book of Daniel). 666 alludes or points to him, and it speaks about how he forced all of his diverse citizens to worship his image. The beast system of revelations will be guilty of taking part in the same forceful perversions.
This is how the Bible explains it: “And all those dwelling in the earth will worship [the beast], those of whom the names had not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb … 14 And [the false prophet] deceives those dwelling on the earth … saying to those dwelling on the earth to make an image to the beast … and might cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.” (Rev 13) (bolding and underline mine)
This is the meaning of 666, it’s the story of Nebuchadnezzar’s golden statue all over again.
Above is an example of the kind of Babylonian percussion that decreed the worship of Nebuchadnezzar’s golden Idol.
This is how the story of King Nebuchadnezzar’s demand for worship goes:
Nebuchadnezzar the king made an image of gold, whose height was threescore cubits [60 cubits], and the breadth thereof six cubits: he set it up in the plain of Dura, in the province of Babylon. Then Nebuchadnezzar the king sent to gather together the princes, the governors, and the captains, the judges, the treasurers, the counsellers, the sheriffs, and all the rulers of the provinces, to come to the dedication of the image which Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up. Then … all the rulers of the provinces, were gathered together unto the dedication of the image that Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up; and they stood before the image that Nebuchadnezzar had set up. Then an herald cried aloud, To you it is commanded, O people, nations, and languages, That at what time ye hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, dulcimer, and all kinds of musick, ye fall down and worship the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king hath set up: And whoso falleth not down and worshippeth shall the same hour be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace. Therefore at that time, when all the people heard the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and all kinds of musick, all the people, the nations, and the languages, fell down and worshipped the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up. Daniel 3:1-7
Six instruments or five?
In some bible versions, this section begins with five instruments and lastly a word about symphony, this word symphony is actually a mistranslation of the word tumpanon.
Evidence that six instruments are used is seen when the instruments involved are reiterated again later in the chaoter, as seen here:
“Thou, O king, hast made a decree, that every man that shall hear the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and dulcimer, and all kinds of musick, shall fall down and worship the golden image:” (Daniel 3:10 same bible version)
For more information on the mistranslation of the instruments found in this section of scripture visit this very informative web site: http://www.bib-arch.org/e-features/band-played-on.asp#
The Six instruments that played are as follow
qayteros – 1st Lyre (mistrans’d as harp) mashroqi – Flute psaltery – 2nd Lyre
sackbut – an actual Harp Dulcimer – tambour – tumpanon Cornet – Qeren – Shofar
Granted all of this information, in the future to come there will be a System that demands the worship of it’s “golden” image (be this image a man or something other) just like the King had desired in Daniel. This system will be helped by either a man, or another system called the false prophet (this prophet is described to be a beast with the two horns like a lamb but speaks as a dragon). So the myth about 666 as being the devils number can be layed to rest. The Bible in no way endorses the beast to be satan, and 666 is a code that is only understood by those who read their Bible, or read this article 
Satanist, and paedophile Alester Crowly found great pleasure in calling himself the beast, yet unbeknownst to him, the beast was not the devil at all. Because he assumed himself to be in a way the anti-Messiah, and because his mother called him the beast when he was young, he assumed 666 was the number that personified all things satanic – this is one show of every satanist’s ignorance and how they willingly believe lies. Sadly, the beast and the Anti-messiah or the one who is actually called the false prophet, are not at all one and the same thing or being, see Revelations 19:20. Crowley’s erroneous knowledge of the Bible lead him to associate the number of idolatry with what he thought was satan. Debunked!
Now satanists trying to show a pledge of allegiance by tattooing 666 on their bodies as a symbol of love for satan, are in fact only glorifying their union with the beast system who in the book of revelations is destroyed, along with everyone else who receive the beats mark. By tattooing 666 on their bodies, these people are telling everyone that they find themselves worthless and worthy of destruction. 666 shows that these people are waiting for everlasting destruction through utter annihilation at the return of Yahshua Jesus! How sadly ignorant and ironic.
Conclusion
666 is not a pledge of allegiance to satan, nor is it his number.
Hello friend, fans and seekers of truth, I’m working on a very important article at the moment that clearly displays demonic possession (in the 1st century) to be not more then a superstitious way of understanding and explaining difficult illnesses (mostly mental). I am still working on the History of religion which is now over 50 pages in length, the topic became much larger and more intricate then I first thought, but is still slowly making inroads. I just wish to thank everyone for their e-mails and support. Truth is one of those things that is either grasped or lost. As long as a small majority of you adhere to the basic and sure teachings of Yahweh through His Word (Yahshua) you may be the ones who lead the future others through these difficult to find but very necessary truths (Yahweh will always lead us to His truth, He is our first teacher, all honour be to Him and Jesus the Messiah). Seek and you shall find, knock and it shall be opened, for Yahweh promises us this always.
With Love, have a blessed Sukkot my brethren!
If you ever have any questions please feel free to ask.
Source
Based on my last post about the non-superstitious understandings regarding Satan, I have been able to provide you with clear biblical evidences showing how the Devil and demons have been based on human fear, heathen concepts, and misunderstandings of the bible. The true Satan is our ability to sin (this being our sinful nature). Many diseases are caused as a result of this sin, (our ideas about demons come from our inability to understand certain disease (this misunderstanding is what the 1st century people called demon possession). Finally, the idea of an impersonal Satan has been shown to be adversarial peoples, governmental oppressors and faulty ideas. When we approach the debate of does or does not the Angelic Satan exist, we see that the rationalists understand and naturally agree with what the renewed scriptural concept (which has always been correct) says. But the major differences between what the rationalists know and what the bible says can found in their lack of understanding of where evil comes from or what the source of sin is. Yahweh is Supreme, which means He brings both good and the evil righteously upon whomever when suitable. If pastors say they see supernatural things occurring during exorcisms, it can be said that even these sights have come from Yahweh in one form or another, for one purpose of another. Scripture shows that at times good angels are sent to be misguiding spirits (2 Chron 18:22). Watch these debates and see how the rationalists agree with scripture without even realizing it, thus showing how the true biblical Christianity is the pinnacle of reason and Virtue. All praise Yahweh in Yahshua Olam.
Many Roman Catholics believe that Peter is the rock in which Jesus the Messiah alluded to in Matthew chapter 16:18. Based on looking into this issue from a different perspective, using the Aramaic Peshitta new testament opposed to the Greek, the capacity for this assertion to be true (that Peter is the rock of scriptural assuredly) has been made a non issue. In the Syrian Aramaic language this passage does not differentiate the name Peter (which is originally Kephas) with the second word used for rock in the same sentence. This occurs because in Aramaic the word Keepa or Kephas which means rock, has multiple meanings but only one word used. Because of this, it is near imposable to state that Peter means anything more then rock (more akin to a stone), and based on further biblical and contextual evidence Keepa as his personal name, is shown to be equal to nothing more then the word lithos in Greek, or Petra which is equivalent to stone in English. (Though Petra and Petros are contentious words said not to be used in the first century of Yahshua).
Excerpt from the paper:
This final scripture is the one of Mat 16. See that all 4 times Keepa is used to mean different sizes of rock.
Since the Peshitta is the source text for the Sinaticus and the other ‘Old Syriac’ text, the above shows that the word rock can be taken in a multitude of ways. To be sure of the meaning of Petros/Chephas/Keepa/Peter in the coming scripture is difficult without a clear understanding of the rest of the Old testament. [We see that the same word is used for rock in all 4 scriptures, these all come from the book of Matthew].
Mat 16:13-18 When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? (14) And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. (15) He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? (16) And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. (17) And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. (18) And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
We must realize that the revelation of Jesus being the Son of the most high Yahweh was not a new revelation, for in chapter 14 of the same epistle of Matthew just after Jesus walked on the sea, the Apostles admitted that “Of a truth thou art the Son of God.” (Mat 14:33) With this acknowledged, when Peter said the same thing out loud he wasn’t revealing some new revelation. What peter did was combine Yahshua’s Sonship with the fact that he was the promised Messiah “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God” (kjv).
The Hebraism
In order to understand the full meaning of this passage we must look at what the name Simon means. In the Hebrew Simon means “hearing”.
H8095
שׁמעון
shim‛ôn
shim-one’
From H8085; hearing; Shimon
The fact that Peter was a sir name and was not his proper name as we even see by his second Epistle beginning with Simon Peter…, the use of the full name Simon Barjon, or hearing son of Jona is used with a specific intent. Let’s look at this scripture with its intended language:
Blessed art thou, hearing son of jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
So the fact that his name means hearing is evidence that God the Father spoke to him and revealed such truth to his understanding. Jesus the Messiah then continues His Hebraism:
(18) And I say also unto thee, that thou art rock, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
This is a play on names, and each name has a purpose in regards to the revelation or knowledge of the Messiah being the Son of God. Let’s look at the parts:
1. Simon means hearing
2. Peter means stone, or rock or boulder and he was the one who heard the Father reveal the Messiahs full identity. Like Peters name, this revelation being the Rock but of a different kind then what Peter stands for was the foundation of all faith and even the church itself.
Further explanation: “Blessed art thou, hearing … for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee …
And I say also unto thee, That thou are stone (cephas), and upon this rock (cephas) I will build my church.
The Hebraism or play on words is that Simon is the same word as hearing and yet was a name explanatory of his reception of said revelation, and Cephas or stone was the same word as rock yet was a name explanatory of his reception of the revelation of Jesus as the Messiah who was the foundational rock of the new testament. If Cephas/peter was to be translated rock and Jesus said upon this rock I will build my church, then the entire pun would have no secondary meaning, thus destroying its structure and intent. This would also be confusing to the hearers for the church was built only upon Jesus the Messiahs death and the Fathers power, for he was rooted in God the Father, and is known in the old testament to all the Apostles as the Rock and foundation of all things (especially the church).
The fact that Jesus the Messiah said “and I say” shows that both the revelation from the Father and the declaration of Peter receiving the rock were a related theme that could not be misconstrued. Quite simply God the Father said to Peter: Jesus is the Messiah the Son of the Living God, and Jesus who is also God said “Upon this rock [alluding to the fathers words], stone or Peter I will build my church”. It was a double affirmative that Jesus was who He said He was, it was also a declaration of his Yahshua’s Godhood.”
Read the full Document Here:
The works and videos offered here come from doctoral dissertations and extremely accurate biblical exegesis. Most of the men being presented have stood against their peers for the sake of Yahweh’s great name. Worldly education counts for little, so I mention such only to show the professionalism of these works. These wisdoms ie, corrections to faulty theology, when and if applied will alter your present spiritual walk removing the dross from your life, and will allow you the fullest access to the Most high Creator through the way of His blessed Child Yahshua (Jesus).
~SPREAD THIS MESSAGE EVERYWHERE!~
________________________________________________________________________________
“3If any man teach … and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Master Yahshua Messiah, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; 4He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 5Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.” (1 Tim 6)
The preachers of the world teach that gain is Godliness. How do we get this gain? By giving Tithes. In this video you will learn that tithes can come only from Israel, and go only to Levites. After this film your mind will be set on the protective truth of Yahweh’s Word.
Should the Christian Church teach Tithing?
Should the church teach Tithing? – Russell Earl Kelly – Download full PDF
This man documents and proves how the Sabbath over time in the 2nd century became Sunday. If you forsake the Sabbath by not keeping it watch this film and see why keeping Sunday is both an act of Anti-Semitism (Contempt for Jesus’ ways), and the keeping of traditions made by the Universal Roman church.
From Sabbath to Sunday – Samuele Bacchiocchi – Download full PDF
This man and his book goes through a point by point study and reveals how the idea of an eternally evil angel is not only an act of theft of glory from Yahweh, but is also a mechanism to keep you from fighting against the true enemy (Your self). I disagree with his views on the place of Messiah, but I completly agree with his views on the truth behind the Adversary, and demons as first century diseases.
The Real Devil – Duncan Heaster – Download full PDF
__________________________________________________________________________________
This film documents how a personal Satan was created. It proves that such an idea is superstition folks, and one that almost every denomination both Messianic and Protestants believe in. Through this belief the full spirit of Yahweh is not existing in everyone’s lives. Repent, grow up and realize that we live in a world of reason.
The History of Satan
A paper on the theological notes of Sir Isaac Newton regarding Satan and Demons
Click Paper to read in full
_________________________________________________________________________________
This is the truth about the pagan origins of the eternally burning, suffering in hell doctrine. Yahweh is a Creator of mercy, you will not burn for all eternity, but, you will be destroyed through great agony and becoming nothing, existing no more forever.
What happens to the dead – Download PDF here
_________________________________________________________________________________
Michael Rood explains the importance of the annual feast days, and he also introduces their meaning to both Jew and gentile (all spiritual Israelites). Forsake your ancient Roman festivals and enter into Yahweh’s Joy!
About the Spring Feasts
About the Fall feasts
With the full understanding of all these elements any person or Church can now begin to walk in the spiritual truth Yahshua (Jesus) first required. If we want revival (which is here) you must let go of these unrealistic superstitions and grasp onto the true Wisdom of righteousness. Rejection of an Angelic demon and the belief in Yahweh’s sovereignty will alter your life forever. Glorifying Yahweh as the one who gives and takes away allows you to glory in Him in a way that very few know today.
Keep the Commandments, Keep the feast days, forsake falsehoods and proclaim the full unadulterated gospel. It is time to walk in the fullness of wisdom. This can be accomplished today if you will open your ears and hear.
I implore you in the Spirit of Messiah, pray and ask if these things are true, then spread the gospel of the Omnipotent Creator!
Glory to His name forever and ever, Amein
There is much evidence towards the alteration of the 4th commandment. Many preachers of Yahweh the Most high, Creator of Heaven and Earth, seem to focus on certain pieces of this puzzle, shining their lights in one location at a time. With many men from different countries all fighting the same unified fight, we are now granted another who was actually Jesuit educated but spend his life dedicated to revealing the truth about the Sabbath.
In this presentation “Brother Sam”, or Dr. Samuel Bacchiocchi uses historical sources to present a fascinating, yet simple argument on how the Catholic church changed the Sabbath to Sunday.
In short, this video explains how:
“Anti-Judaism caused the abandonment of the Sabbath, and pagan sun worship influenced the adoption of Sunday”.
Some have criticized Dr. Sam as being a secret Jesuit infiltrator, but based on my experience, and this has been through the direct teaching from the Spirit of Yahweh, Brother Sam is not a secret Jesuit at all. His pro Catholic leanings are more pro individual than pro establishment. His revelations, and even other written works prove him not to be a Jesuit. He also calls the Catholic church the Beast of revelations openly. I don’t agree with everything he says, but his research is spot on. This movie will be a great benefit to anyone who loves the Word of Yahweh.
Link to full size movie: Here
Link to his Book: From Sabbath to Sunday
I hope this film, and it’s subsequent parts has helped your spiritual walk.
May Yahshua the Messiah richly bless you with all that you need as you work hard in His spiritual Kingdom.
Truly.
Modern Art: Its Occult Beginnings
If we look at history, we see that Art itself has been the true god of the Yahweh-less man. Statues of Idols “the works of human hands” are the things that were venerated and worshipped as deities. Men naturally applied their imaginations to these works and attributed spiritual powers to them (even though said powers were fictional). Continuing from our teaching about the renaissance, when Paganism once again invaded Europe, it was the ancient form and styles of art which engaged the minds on mass moving them towards rebellion against scriptural righteousness and ethical living. We now must fast forward to the more modern era. We shall see that the effects of the renaissance have never completely faded. There were many religious reformations of different degrees and sorts that took place after the renaissance and the 1900’s but the cankering disease of freedom from all moral rule was now a staple in the mind of everyone. Artists who in a form were rebels against the old standard began deconstructing even the pagonic classical forms, and set out to create something radically new. In their search to define their new arts, they turned to occultism and gained strength through its philosophies. In this article we will discuss how modern art embraced Anti-Messianic ideals writ large to come to the place it is today, and we will also see how occultism / paganism is one to one with the modern dysfunctional forms we take as normal today.
KUPKA Frantisek
"Czech painter and graphic artist, born in 1871 at Dobruska, Bohemia, died in 1957. Kupka studied at the School of Fine Arts in Prague. To support himself, he gave lessons in religion and worked as a medium at spiritual séances. He was immersed in the thought of the French eighteenth century, and so was overwhelmed by an exhibition of the Impressionists in a Prague gallery. In 1991 he studied in Vienna and, in 1895, in Paris, where he has lived ever since. He studied from Nature and greatly admired Rodin and Toulouse-Lautrec. He undertook some important illustrative work: Lysistrata, Prometheus of Aeschylus and Les Erinnyes of Leconte de Lisle. He learnt Hebrew when commissioned by Élie Faure to make drawings for a new translation of the Song of Songs. His studio had the calm atmosphere of a religious workshop. From 1906 on his painting changed profoundly; his technical development served in imagination which saw beyond appearances. In his landscapes Kupka sought the distortions of bodies in water and expressed them in cold, strident colours." (http://serdar-hizli-art.com/modern_painting/kupka_frantisek.htm)
He claimed his paintings illustrated ideas in science, physics, astronomy, and biology, in all of which he was widely read. He was also knowledgeable about world religions and was particularly interested in the modern esoteric religion Theosophy, which tried to reconcile spiritualism with science. Throughout his life Kupka had a strong interest and, some claim, an involvement with the occult. (frantisek kupka; encyclopedia of world biography)
Two other pioneers, Frantisek Kupka, a Czech, and Kasimir Malevitch, a Russian who in 1914 and 1915 exhibited a series of squares on plain backgrounds, were also avid readers of theosophy and other metaphysical works. Kupka studied Greek, German and Oriental philosophy, along with a variety of theosophical texts. Douglas writes that the aesthetics of Malevich and his circle "resulted from a unified world view that encompassed all dichotomies; for them science and Eastern mystical ideas were seamlessly joined in a conceptual continuum, and knowledge of the world might be obtained by beginning at any point." (Christian Century, September 30, 1987, p. 819: http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1065)
Piet Moderan
In the period that saw the genesis of abstract art—roughly the decade beginning in 1910—what is particularly striking about the outlook of the artists primarily responsible for creating abstraction is their espousal of occult doctrine. So prevalent was a steadfast belief in the occult among the pioneers of abstract art—not only Mondrian but also Kandinsky, Malevich, and a good many of their disciples— that we have no alternative but to regard such doctrine as a basic component of their artistic vision.
But meanwhile, in the spiritually imperfect present, an art that aspired to make itself the instrument of pure spirit—to align itself with what Kandinsky described in "On the Spiritual in Art" as the struggle toward the non-naturalistic, the abstract, toward inner nature—had no alternative but to make its case as an earthly cultural enterprise. … It was for this reason that even the most mystical of the pioneer creators of abstract art found themselves engaged in a dialectic that embraced two very different aspirations—on the one hand, that of advanced artistic thought, with its headlong drive to discover new modalities of pictorial expression, and, on the other, that of a spiritual ideal that looked upon art as a means to an end that transcended art itself.
The occult symbolism is clearly defined in this modernist work. This work employs almost every technique termed a modernist style.
But the truth is that in every realm of high endeavour in which we find mysticism serving as a spur and an ideal—in movements of political revolution and campaigns for sexual emancipation, for example, no less than in avant-garde art movements—this loyalty to occult doctrine has proven to be a powerful incentive to practical achievement. Within the imaginative faculties there is nothing that so stirs the will to accomplish extraordinary things as the conviction that one is possessed of absolute knowledge about the ultimate destiny of human affairs. This was precisely the kind of mystical conviction that the pioneer creators of abstraction brought not only to their own innovations as artists but to the formation of avant-garde movements that changed the direction of modernist art and greatly expanded the place it would come to occupy in modern cultural life.
It is this belief in the absolute that accounts for the speed as well as the confidence which the pioneers of abstraction brought to their break with what they saw as the last vestiges of representation in art, and for the success they achieved in winning converts to their radical view of artistic expression. These artist-acolytes of the occult really did believe they were fulfilling a unique spiritual mission in this fateful act of artistic innovation, and they persuaded a great many others to join them in that belief. Theirs was, in this sense, a religious movement as well as an artistic one, and they brought to it the kind of intensely felt faith that we associate with spiritual yearning and religious conversion.
In the latest developments of the art of their time, which in the case of Cubism had already brought painting to the very verge of abandoning representation, they shrewdly discerned a “logic” that cried out for completion. This gave to abstraction a powerful sense of purpose—a kind of ontological imperative—that was all the more compelling when combined with the promise of a spiritual vocation. As artists, the pioneers of abstraction had largely mastered in their earlier paintings the rapid succession of styles that had moved from Realism and Impressionism to the Post-Impressionist, Fauvist, Expressionist, and Cubist art which dominated the European avant-garde in the last decade of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth.
The doctrinaire abstraction that was rooted in theosophical ideas was therefore seen to constitute, in the early years of its development, a counter-avant-garde opposed to the mainstream artistic interests of the School of Paris. It was, as far as Paris was concerned, virtually an underground movement that did not enjoy the critical acclaim, or even the kind of critical scandal, that had marked the emergence of Fauvism and Cubism before the First World War and would again mark the emergence of Dada and Surrealism in the years following the war.
“Plastic Mathematics is a "positive mysticism" in which "we translate reality into constructions controlled by our reason, later to recover these constructions in nature, thus penetrating matter with plastic vision". Schpenmaeker believed that the new plastic expression (Neoplasticism), born of light and sound, would create a heaven on earth.”
(Modern Architecture, Alan Colquhoun)What is remarkable about ‘The New Plastic in Painting’ is not only its triumphal affirmation of pure abstraction as an aesthetic “absolute”—a word that was repeatedly sounded throughout the manifesto—but the anxious attention that is lavished on the need to emancipate painting from the thralldom of what is variously called ‘nature’s appearance,’ ‘naturalistic representation,’ ‘naturalistic form,’’naturalistic color,’ and so on. Nature haunts the pages of ‘The New Plastic in Painting’ like a spectre that can be neither exorcised nor appeased. It can only be resisted by an act of transcendent artistic conscience that makes the pursuit of the ‘universal’ a quest so absolute that all the contingencies of nature are stripped of their importance.
(Mondrian & mysticism ’My long search is over’ by Hilton Kramer; http://www.redbubble.com/painters-in-modern-times/forums/560/topics/10823-mondrian-positive-mysticism-and-plastic-mathematics-article)
What Mondrian purposed to do was strip creation of its realness, and for that substitute a fakeness. The purpose in doing such was to create a new aesthetic reality wholly made in the image of man, and entirely new. In the process of wanting such a radical change, he came up with his own philosophy called Neoplasticism, and from this philosophy we get our modern vector art. Problem is that this new art form, although mimicking reality, is not. And this fake reality makes children equate visual representations with the real thing. The sort of problems this produces is not fully ascertained, but he felt as though it would change human kind in a radical form, and thus we see his artistic effects implemented in children’s cartoons. Everything here is rooted in Theosophy and the occult.
Picasso and the Occult
Pablo Picasso Evil behind his expression:
"No, painting is not made to decorate apartments, it’s an offensive and defensive weapon against the enemy." (Tery, Picasso, n’est pas officer dans l’Armee francaise, Les Lettres Francaises, March 24, 1945)
"We all know that art is not truth. Art is a lie that makes us realize truth, at least the truth that is given us to understand. The artist must know the manner whereby to convince others of the truthfulness of his lies." (The Arts, Picasso Speaks, 1923)
"What is truth? Truth cannot exist. … Truth does not exist. … Truth is a lie." (Parmelin, Picasso: The Artist, His Model, and Other Related Works, 1965, p. 110)
The DADA Movement
We see that modern art, with its abstractions and deconstructions of reality, are highly influenced by the occult ideas of men gaining all knowledge and art as a form of ascension from this realm to one greater. If we have a generation who hungers to mimic artists who’ve used occult means in order to express new forms of creativity, it is only rational to see that our endeavours and appreciations of orderly conduct are going backwards instead of forwards. The problem with abstract art is that it makes something that it ugly, disordered, and bizarre, to seem as though it’s beautiful, charming and acceptable. This is how evil transmutes itself into goodness.
Dysfunction made fitting:
Underground becomes main stream
Punk Rock made acceptable:
There was once a time in both American and Canada when strangely colourer hair was highly disapproved. But with an influx of new styles, and the blurring of moral standards, we can find our politicians with pink streaks in their hair. Why is this important? Such things are meaningful to observe because they represent how society is descending into the depth of anarchy, and accepting thinds they once abhorred due to their unnaturalness and blatant rebellion.
Punk first emerged in the mid 1970s in London as an anarchist and aggressive movement. About 200 young people defined themselves as part of an anti-fashion urban youth street cultural movement. Closely aligned was a music movement that took the name punk…The clothes suited the lifestyle of those with limited cash due to unemployment and the general low income school leavers…Punks cut up old clothes from charity and thrift shops, destroyed the fabric and refashioned outfits in a manner then thought a crude construction technique, making garments designed to attract attention… in the 1970s it shocked many people, because it had never been seen before.
Body piercing was done in parts other than the usually accepted placement of the ear lobe. The placement of studs and pins in face, body parts such as eyebrows and cheeks, noses or lips, for the masses was then quite unusual even after the freedom of the 1960s.
Here we see punk influence in the media. In fact, such an influence is just more conditioning. Dysfunction is fed, but by the tea spoon.
-FROM GOOD TO UGLY-
Here are a few images of stars in their natural states, then them when influenced by the trends.
Miley Cirus
Beyonce Knowles
Rihanna
Little children have no choice but to copy the fads because if they don’t they will be overlooked and left alone. This world becomes dysfunctional one degree at a time. Just that normal has adopted elements of what was once anarchy shows that ethical lines have not only been blurred, but completely eroded away.
Tattoos
Ye shall not … print any marks upon you: I am YAHWEH.
Leviticus 19:28
Tattoo enthusiast and historian, Steve Gilbert, in his popular, Tattoo History: A Source Book, cites some of the historical facts Hambly [a tattoo historian] found in his extensive research.
[Hambly] "retailed a wealth of examples which he had culled from field work by anthropologists in many parts of the world. Tattooing was supposed to: prevent pain; protect against gunshot wounds; cur illness; confer superhuman strength; preserve youth; enhance the supernatural powers of a shaman; ensure the survival of the soul after death; identify the soul in the hereafter; attract good luck; protect against witchcraft; ensure the protection of a deity; confer occult powers; prevent drowning; exorcise demons; ensure the protection of a totemic animal or spiritual guardian; record a pilgrimage to a holy place, etc. . .
This blue bowl (c. 1300 B.C.), housed in the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden in Leiden, Amsterdam, features a musician tattooed with an image of the household deity Bes on her thigh. (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/10023606.html#)
"the worship of the sun-god Baal had involved the marking of the hands [tattoos] with the divine token in a mystic attempt to acquire strength."
(Ronald Scutt, Art, Sex and Symbol, 1974, p. 64)
[Tattooing] "[Is] association with sun-worship, megalithic building, ear-piercing, serpent worship"
(Ronald Scutt, Art, Sex and Symbol, 1974, p. 22)
"The reasons why puncturing the skin should be regarded with some degree of awe are not far to seek, for in the first place, there is the drawing of blood, which to the savage world over is full of significance as a rejuvenating and immortalizing factor. There is in addition to the opening of numerous inlets for evil to enter. . ."
(Hambly Wilfrid D. 1925. The History of Tattooing and its Significance, p. 233, cited in Gilbert, Steve, Tattoo History: A Source Book, p. 162)
"Tattooing is often a magical rite in the more traditional cultures, and the tattooist is respected as a priest or shaman."
(Michelle Delio, Tattoo: The Exotic Art of Skin Decoration, p. 73)"The actual tattooing process, which involved complex ritual and taboos, could only be done by priests and was associated with beliefs which were secrets known only to members of the priestly caste. . . Hambly concluded that historically tattooing had originated in connection with ancient rites of scarification and bloodletting which were associated with religious practices intended to put the human soul in harmony with supernatural forces and ensure continuity between this life and the next." (Gilbert, Steve, Tattoo History: A Source Book, p. 158)
Tattooing is a return to mans pagonic histories, it is a complete circle. The issue with such an “art form” is that it desecrates something that Yahweh made perfect. We are given clothing to adorn ourselves, so things such as ink under the skin shouldn’t be required, especially when Yahweh told us not to do it. This prohibition was meant to separate the Israelites from the pagan tribes, today not having a tattoo symbolises a certain purity. Since Tattoos are rife in popularity, those without them stand apart as almost odd. Christians should stand up for the beauty of original form.
Degradation in Fashion
In 1971 these sinful jeans hit the market. Created by two Italian men who used the scripture to promote licentiousness, these designers were only mimicking their forefathers found in the humanism of the Renaissance.
“The knee-length hemline from the 1920’s stayed in place for about 30 years or so. The conservative 1950’s were followed by a great decade of revolution. This decade brought the miniskirt into the limelight and this new hemline caused quite a fashion stir during its time. Hemlines rose to unheard of heights during this decade and many of us typically think of the sixties when we think of the mini.” (http://www.dressandskirt.com/dresses-and-skirts.htm)
Modesty has jumped screaming out the window. If a person from the 1920’s arrived in a time machine to 2011, I’m sure they would presume themselves to be in what was mystically imagined as a level of hell.
New female trend, showing the thong
A male trend popularized by Prison culture and spread through Hip hop, the exposure of the entire buttocks
“8Hear, O my people, and I will testify unto thee: O Israel, if thou wilt hearken unto me;
9There shall no strange god be in thee; neither shalt thou worship any strange god.
10I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
11But my people would not hearken to my voice; and Israel would none of me.
12So I gave them up unto their own hearts’ lust: and they walked in their own counsels.
13Oh that my people had hearkened unto me, and Israel had walked in my ways!” (Psalm 81)
What we adorn ourselves in represents what we cherish. Many brands become idols in the sight of Yahweh because they are representative signs of pagan gods and goddesses. We must be aware of these symbols, with placing them on our bodies we propagate their messages through our wearing them. The coming revelations will leave you shocked or angered. Will you destroy these idols or remain wearing them to be like everyone else?
“Nike is the Greek goddess of victory. She presided over the earliest battlefields, and since the 1928 Summer Olympic Games, every Olympic medal bears Nike’s figure holding a palm frond in her left hand and a winner’s crown in her right. The Nike SWOOSH came about in 1971. It represents the wing of the Greek goddess Nike.” ( http://inside.nike.com/blogs/nikewomen-en_US/2009/12/22/nike-goddess)
“The logo represents the wing of the Greek Goddess.The Nike logo is a classic case of a company gradually simplifying its corporate identity as its frame increases. The company’s first logo appeared in 1971, when the word "Nike," the Greek goddess of victory, was printed in orange over the outline of a checkmark, the sign of a positive mark. Used as a motif on sports shoes since the 1970s, this checkmark is now so recognizable that the company name itself has became superfluous.”
The Pentagram, period.
“Medusa Gorgon Goddess of Righteous Wrath. In some traditions she was a serpent goddess of the Libyan Amazons and represented female wisdom. In others she was an Anatolian Sun Goddess. Medusa is identical with the Crone or Destroyer aspect of the dark Egyptian goddess Nieth; she was also one member of the triple personae of the North African goddess An-Ath. When that goddess was imported by the Greeks as patroness of Athens, Medusa’s fierce visage was embossed on Athena’s shield.”
Barbara Walker hypothesizes in her book, The Woman’s Dictionary of Symbols and Sacred Objects, that the Ichthys was the son of the pagan sea goddess Atargatis. She also posits that the Ichthys symbol was a representation of sexuality and fertility. It is also a symbol for the Goddess Venus.
This franchise supports Indian Yoga, and derives its symbol from Astrology. It’ anti-Messianic ideals are self explanatory.
Greek chimera, a evil deity in Greek mythology
The Mercedes comes from Germany, and it in itself is an embodiment of Envy and Vanity. The reason it is so evil is because its symbol is from occult / pagan roots. These vehicles are the sorts that ethical Yahweh loving followers of Messiah should not hunger to own. If you do own one, like I once did, you will quickly realize that the negative attention it brings is not pure. You will see why and how they become idols in your life. These vehicles are idols through and through, and yes they are coveted by the world for a reason.
The triskelion is a symbol formed by three of almost anything conjoined and radiating from the center—triangles, commas, lines, circles, tear or water drops, trombone slides, arms, or legs. Such symbols are very widespread in human cultures and are found all the way from Celtic mythology to Buddhist art.
The Triskelion is the triple-triangle form of fate (or the fates). Three rings were supposed to invoke the three fates in several ancient traditions. The number three is particularly sacred to the celts – the used a triple cycle for the seasons, and for many magical patterns. Celtic goddesses frequently appear in triple form – from ancient times, the great earth mother was a trinity, representing her three aspects, maiden, mother and crone. The triskele is a three-legged pattern with a variety of manifestations in romano-British art. … The triskele pattern is often used as a magical charm- probably to avert evil. Spirals are among the most sacred signs of Neolithic Europe, symbolizing the womb, death and re-birth, they appear on megalithic monuments, entrances to caves – sacred places of worship, all over the continent and the British isles, such as Newgrange in Ireland, and Gavrinis in Brittany. The spiral was a particular symbol of the Goddess faith. Spirals also symbolized the coiled serpent or dragon, both regarded as sacred in the old religion, representing the natural energies of the earth and sky.
This logo is perfectly sun worship, period.
Above Greek sun crosses
Below diverse and similar sun crosses
So we see good followers of Messiah, in order to keep ourselves un-tainted from the world we need to study showing ourselves approved, and be wise in all things we take part in. Many of you will read this wisdom and shrug it off, but now since you gave been taught and do understand that idolatry exists in nearly everything, from abstract art to fashion trends, we must clean up our lives and acts, and have them resemble a more Yahwehli kind of vision. Yahweh hates Idols, and coveting such will definitely remain a block from His full blessings entering your life.
This is an excerpt from Bunyan’s “Pilgrims progress” and it represents vanity fair. This fair is the culmination of all things anti-Messiah, and it actually represents all the things our world holds dear. I recommend the novel “Pilgrams Progress” for it is beneficial for every Christian to at least read once.
“Then I saw in my dreams, that, when they were out of the wilderness, they presently saw a town before them, and the name of that town is Vanity; and at the town there is a fair kept, called Vanity Fair. It is kept all the year long. It bears the name of Vanity Fair, because the town where it is kept is lighter that vanity, and also because all that is sold there, or that comes there, is vanity; as is the saying of the Wise, �All that cometh is vanity.�
This is no newly begun business, but a thing of ancient standing. I will show you the original of it.
Almost five thousand years ago, there were pilgrims walking to the Celestial city, as these as these two honest persons are; and Beelzebub, Apollyon, and Legion, with their companions seeing that the path of the pilgrims lay through this town of Vanity, set up a fair; a fair where they would see all sorts of vanity, and it should last all the year long. Therefore at this fair are all such things sold as houses, lands, trades, places, honors, preferments, titles, countries, kingdoms, lusts, pleasures, and delights of all sorts, as wives, husbands, children, masters, servants, lives, blood, bodies, souls, silver, gold, pearls, precious stones, and what not.
At this fair there are at all times to be seen jugglings, cheats, games, plays, fools, apes, knaves, and rogues, and that of every kind.
Also, there are several rows and streets under their proper names, where such and such wares are sold, such as Britain Row, the French Row, the Italian row, the Spanish Row, the German Row, where several sorts of vanities are to be sold. Also the wares of Rome are greatly promoted in this fair.”
Yahweh and Yahshua Bless you and Keep you. More articles in this vein coming soon.
Give Yahweh the Weightiness.
